<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Workflow: Writing&#187; By PHILIP B. CORBETT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workflowWriting.com/author/by-philip-b-corbett/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workflowWriting.com</link>
	<description>The Information Writers Need, Where They Can Find It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Latin Words We Love Too Much</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/665148/latin-words-we-love-too-much.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/665148/latin-words-we-love-too-much.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/latin-words-we-love-too-much/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1990, the phrase "bona fides" appeared four times in The Times, according to our archive: three times in editorials and once in Sports. Last year we used the term - a Latin phrase meaning "good faith" - 93 times,&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/665148/latin-words-we-love-too-much.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word to Watch: &#8216;Advocate&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/664420/word-to-watch-advocate.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/664420/word-to-watch-advocate.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/advocate-pros-and-cons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My colleague Mark Bulik points out an oddly oxymoronic construction that has been popping up lately: "an anti-[blank] advocate." It's like saying, "He supports opposing it." Just a few of many recent examples:&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/664420/word-to-watch-advocate.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bright Passages</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/663770/bright-passages-12.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/663770/bright-passages-12.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/bright-passages-12/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months of nonstop carping about our missteps, here's the latest, long-overdue sampling of sparkling prose from recent editions. Nominations are always welcome.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/663770/bright-passages-12.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spell-Check: Still No Help</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/663004/spell-check-still-no-help.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/663004/spell-check-still-no-help.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/01/spell-check-still-no-help/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my recent lineup of sound-alike mix-ups, sharp-eyed readers and colleagues quickly offered examples to refill the file folder. The latest:&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/663004/spell-check-still-no-help.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courtesy and History</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/662265/courtesy-and-history.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/662265/courtesy-and-history.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/24/courtesy-and-history/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times's use or omission of courtesy titles in referring to dead people is an occasional source of confusion. Some readers (and some writers) mistakenly think that once anyone dies, we automatically and immediately stop using Mr., Ms. or Mrs.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/662265/courtesy-and-history.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Spell-Check Can&#8217;t Help</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/661570/when-spell-check-cant-help-12.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/661570/when-spell-check-cant-help-12.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/when-spell-check-cant-help-14/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've held off for a while, but the sound-alike mix-up file is starting to overflow. Here are the latest lapses involving similar-seeming words - some new problems and some familiar ones. And some, frankly, that are pretty embarrassing.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/661570/when-spell-check-cant-help-12.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Words We Love Too Much</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/660941/more-words-we-love-too-much-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/660941/more-words-we-love-too-much-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/10/more-words-we-love-too-much-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Deadline's relentless cliché watch continues, thanks to Patrick LaForge and some other sharp-eyed colleagues. In deadline haste, sometimes it's hard to avoid falling back on a familiar stockpile of words and phrases. But let's stay alert and not write&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/660941/more-words-we-love-too-much-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trouble With &#8216;As&#8217; and &#8216;Than&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/660161/trouble-with-as-and-than.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/660161/trouble-with-as-and-than.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/trouble-with-as-and-than/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's surprising how often we stumble over constructions involving comparisons with "as" or "than." This is a case where reading aloud (even reading "aloud" to yourself) may save you from a misstep. These lapses are easy to miss by eye&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/660161/trouble-with-as-and-than.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words We Love Too Much</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/659348/words-we-love-too-much-6.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/659348/words-we-love-too-much-6.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/words-we-love-too-much-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My colleague Patrick LaForge remains on the prowl for clichés - particularly the clichés of journalese, employed primarily by journalists reaching for the quick and easy phrase on deadline.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/659348/words-we-love-too-much-6.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something Old, Something Fresh</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658450/something-old-something-fresh.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658450/something-old-something-fresh.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=8239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may be time for another "fresh" reminder. My colleague Missy Prebula points out that despite previous laments on this topic (see the second item here), we seem more enamored than ever of "fresh" as an alternative to "new" or&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658450/something-old-something-fresh.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something Old, Something Fresh</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658589/something-old-something-fresh-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658589/something-old-something-fresh-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/20/something-old-something-fresh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may be time for another "fresh" reminder. My colleague Missy Prebula points out that despite previous laments on this topic (see the second item here), we seem more enamored than ever of "fresh" as an alternative to "new" or&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658589/something-old-something-fresh-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaving &#8216;Well&#8217; Alone</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658590/leaving-well-alone-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658590/leaving-well-alone-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/leaving-well-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When appropriate, a light touch or a bit of humor is certainly welcome in our writing. But a colleague pointed out that one leavening device has become so common as to seem more like a tic: the "comma-well-comma" trick.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658590/leaving-well-alone-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaving &#8216;Well&#8217; Alone</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/657658/leaving-well-alone.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/657658/leaving-well-alone.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=8209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When appropriate, a light touch or a bit of humor is certainly welcome in our writing. But a colleague pointed out that one leavening device has become so common as to seem more like a tic: the "comma-well-comma" trick.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/657658/leaving-well-alone.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble With &#8216;They&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658591/the-trouble-with-they-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658591/the-trouble-with-they-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/06/the-trouble-with-they/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lack of gender-neutral singular pronouns in English continues to pose a challenge to careful writers. There's a growing tendency to accept "they" or "their" to refer to an indefinite or singular antecedent, and this solution seems likely to win&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658591/the-trouble-with-they-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble With &#8216;They&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/656870/the-trouble-with-they.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/656870/the-trouble-with-they.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=8183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lack of gender-neutral singular pronouns in English continues to pose a challenge to careful writers. There's a growing tendency to accept "they" or "their" to refer to an indefinite or singular antecedent, and this solution seems likely to win&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/656870/the-trouble-with-they.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding &#8216;Journalese&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658592/avoiding-journalese-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658592/avoiding-journalese-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/avoiding-journalese/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all move faster than we used to, because deadlines loom at all hours of the day. But one thing that should still set us apart is our careful consideration of language and our aversion to the easy clichés, hype&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658592/avoiding-journalese-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding &#8216;Journalese&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/654732/avoiding-journalese.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/654732/avoiding-journalese.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=8079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all move faster than we used to, because deadlines loom at all hours of the day. But one thing that should still set us apart is our careful consideration of language and our aversion to the easy clichés, hype&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/654732/avoiding-journalese.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words We Love Too Much</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658593/words-we-love-too-much-5.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658593/words-we-love-too-much-5.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/words-we-love-too-much-7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm reluctant to carp when we use a somewhat out-of-the-ordinary word. Sometimes it's the perfect choice, and many readers appreciate that The Times offers intelligent prose that isn't watered down.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658593/words-we-love-too-much-5.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words We Love Too Much</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/654067/words-we-love-too-much-4.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/654067/words-we-love-too-much-4.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=8013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm reluctant to carp when we use a somewhat out-of-the-ordinary word. Sometimes it's the perfect choice, and many readers appreciate that The Times offers intelligent prose that isn't watered down.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/654067/words-we-love-too-much-4.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allusions We Love Too Much</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658594/allusions-we-love-too-much-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658594/allusions-we-love-too-much-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/allusions-we-love-too-much/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the harried headline writer, certain tried-and-true devices can seem almost irresistible.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658594/allusions-we-love-too-much-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allusions We Love Too Much</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/653385/allusions-we-love-too-much.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/653385/allusions-we-love-too-much.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the harried headline writer, certain tried-and-true devices can seem almost irresistible.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/653385/allusions-we-love-too-much.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those Tricky Vowels</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658595/those-tricky-vowels-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658595/those-tricky-vowels-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/those-tricky-vowels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We spelled the word "indispensable" correctly 161 times in the last year. Unfortunately, we spelled it incorrectly, as "indispensible," 17 times, an error rate of nearly 10 percent.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658595/those-tricky-vowels-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those Tricky Vowels</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/652665/those-tricky-vowels.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/652665/those-tricky-vowels.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We spelled the word "indispensable" correctly 161 times in the last year. Unfortunately, we spelled it incorrectly, as "indispensible," 17 times, an error rate of nearly 10 percent.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/652665/those-tricky-vowels.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mangled Shakespeare</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658596/mangled-shakespeare-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658596/mangled-shakespeare-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/mangled-shakespeare/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone loves to quote Shakespeare. "To be or not to be" may be the weariest of clichés, but no one will give it the rest it has earned.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658596/mangled-shakespeare-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mangled Shakespeare</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/651871/mangled-shakespeare.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/651871/mangled-shakespeare.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone loves to quote Shakespeare. "To be or not to be" may be the weariest of clichés, but no one will give it the rest it has earned.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/651871/mangled-shakespeare.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble With &#8216;Like&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658597/the-trouble-with-like-3.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658597/the-trouble-with-like-3.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/the-trouble-with-like-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many ways to misuse "like," and we do so, repeatedly.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658597/the-trouble-with-like-3.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble With &#8216;Like&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/651023/the-trouble-with-like-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/651023/the-trouble-with-like-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many ways to misuse "like," and we do so, repeatedly.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/651023/the-trouble-with-like-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning: Danglers Ahead</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658598/warning-danglers-ahead-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658598/warning-danglers-ahead-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/03/warning-danglers-ahead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's a year-end sampling of one of our most common grammatical errors. Remember that when a participle construction, appositive or other modifying phrase starts a sentence, the person or thing being described should generally come directly after the modifying phrase.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658598/warning-danglers-ahead-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning: Danglers Ahead</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/650190/warning-danglers-ahead.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/650190/warning-danglers-ahead.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's a year-end sampling of one of our most common grammatical errors. Remember that when a participle construction, appositive or other modifying phrase starts a sentence, the person or thing being described should generally come directly after the modifying phrase.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/650190/warning-danglers-ahead.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Spell-Check Can&#8217;t Help</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658599/when-spell-check-cant-help-11.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658599/when-spell-check-cant-help-11.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/27/when-spell-check-cant-help-13/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AfterDeadline

This is a well-worn topic in After Deadline. But it never takes long to refill the file of sound-alike mix-ups. Here are a few of the latest examples - add them to your checklist.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658599/when-spell-check-cant-help-11.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Spell-Check Can&#8217;t Help</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/649647/when-spell-check-cant-help-10.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/649647/when-spell-check-cant-help-10.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AfterDeadlineThis is a well-worn topic in After Deadline. But it never takes long to refill the file of sound-alike mix-ups. Here are a few of the latest examples - add them to your checklist.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/649647/when-spell-check-cant-help-10.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost in Translation</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658600/lost-in-translation-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658600/lost-in-translation-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/20/lost-in-translation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We make a lot of mistakes in English - but then, we publish a lot of words in English.

We publish far fewer words in French, Latin and other foreign languages. Good thing, too, because our error rate when we&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658600/lost-in-translation-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost in Translation</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/649057/lost-in-translation.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/649057/lost-in-translation.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We make a lot of mistakes in English - but then, we publish a lot of words in English.We publish far fewer words in French, Latin and other foreign languages. Good thing, too, because our error rate when we venture&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/649057/lost-in-translation.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions and Billions</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/648271/millions-and-billions.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/648271/millions-and-billions.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We never say "one" if we really mean "a thousand." So why, oh why do we so often say "million" when we mean "billion"? The magnitude of the error is the same - we're off not by one consonant, but&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/648271/millions-and-billions.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions and Billions</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658601/millions-and-billions-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658601/millions-and-billions-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/millions-and-billions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We never say "one" if we really mean "a thousand." So why, oh why do we so often say "million" when we mean "billion"? The magnitude of the error is the same - we're off not by one consonant, but&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658601/millions-and-billions-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Slang Patrol</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658602/the-slang-patrol-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658602/the-slang-patrol-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/the-slang-patrol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enlivening otherwise dry or somber topics, from Wall Street to Pakistan, is an admirable goal. But tossing in slang or colloquial expressions, a faddish buzzword or some hip lingo from a bygone era is seldom the best solution. Many colloquialisms&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658602/the-slang-patrol-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Slang Patrol</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/647118/the-slang-patrol.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/647118/the-slang-patrol.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enlivening otherwise dry or somber topics, from Wall Street to Pakistan, is an admirable goal. But tossing in slang or colloquial expressions, a faddish buzzword or some hip lingo from a bygone era is seldom the best solution. Many colloquialisms&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/647118/the-slang-patrol.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tangled Passages</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/658603/tangled-passages-5.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/658603/tangled-passages-5.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/tangled-passages-6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Times readers are sophisticated and don't expect "Run, Spot, run" syntax. But news is read in a hurry, and we should strive for clear, sharp prose that aids rapid comprehension. Long, complex sentences slow readers down and can lead our&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/658603/tangled-passages-5.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tangled Passages</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/645983/tangled-passages-4.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/645983/tangled-passages-4.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Times readers are sophisticated and don't expect "Run, Spot, run" syntax. But news is read in a hurry, and we should strive for clear, sharp prose that aids rapid comprehension. Long, complex sentences slow readers down and can lead our&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/645983/tangled-passages-4.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bright Passages</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/645141/bright-passages-11.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/645141/bright-passages-11.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest subjective sampling of sparkling prose from recent pages. Read 'em and weep, or laugh, or cheer.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/645141/bright-passages-11.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phrases Gone Astray</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/644303/phrases-gone-astray-3.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/644303/phrases-gone-astray-3.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sharp-eyed readers found some new cases where a modifying phrase comes at the wrong point in a sentence, potentially leading to momentary confusion or unintended comedy.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/644303/phrases-gone-astray-3.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Names Wrong</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/643445/getting-names-wrong-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/643445/getting-names-wrong-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting people's names right is one of the most basic tasks of reporting and editing. Of course, it's not as easy as it may seem to outsiders - scores of stories, hundreds or thousands of names, every day, all day&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/643445/getting-names-wrong-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Spell-Check Can&#8217;t Help</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/642536/when-spell-check-cant-help-9.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/642536/when-spell-check-cant-help-9.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been only six weeks or so since our last installment of sound-alike mix-ups, but the file is already starting to fill up again. Here's the latest batch - all repeat offenses - including one in a headline.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/642536/when-spell-check-cant-help-9.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awhile and a While</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/641690/awhile-and-a-while.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/641690/awhile-and-a-while.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Awhile" is an adverb. It modifies a verb and means "for a short time": He chatted awhile and then left. "Awhile" should not be used as the object of a preposition, so constructions like "for awhile" or "in awhile" are&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/641690/awhile-and-a-while.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bright Passages</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/640959/bright-passages-10.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/640959/bright-passages-10.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another small sampling of sparkling prose from recent editions.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/640959/bright-passages-10.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Number Trouble</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/640002/number-trouble-3.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/640002/number-trouble-3.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many dismayed readers would attest, agreement problems are probably our most common grammatical fault - subject and verb, subject and predicate noun, pronoun and antecedent.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/640002/number-trouble-3.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Reader&#8217;s Lament</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/639087/the-readers-lament.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/639087/the-readers-lament.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Times readers expect nothing but the best in our writing and editing. Too often, they're disappointed. My colleague Patrick LaForge, who oversees our copy desks, described their dismay and offered some suggestions in this memo to editors:&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/639087/the-readers-lament.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Many Whoms</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/637892/too-many-whoms-2.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/637892/too-many-whoms-2.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who or whom? It should be easy. Use "who" for the subject in a relative clause, "whom" for a direct object or object of a preposition. And yet, problems arise constantly.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/637892/too-many-whoms-2.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dangler Zone</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/637120/the-dangler-zone.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/637120/the-dangler-zone.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[September is shaping up as a refresher course in some of our most popular lapses. Last week, homophone mix-ups. This week, the dreaded dangler. And next week - will it be who/whom problems or subject-verb agreement? Stay tuned.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/637120/the-dangler-zone.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Spell-Check Can&#8217;t Help</title>
		<link>http://workflowWriting.com/636228/when-spell-check-cant-help-8.php</link>
		<comments>http://workflowWriting.com/636228/when-spell-check-cant-help-8.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By PHILIP B. CORBETT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For All Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=7035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few new problems involving words that sound alike, or nearly so.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://workflowWriting.com/636228/when-spell-check-cant-help-8.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://topics.blogs.nytimes.com/" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

